Difference between revisions of "EMO:SFT Overview"

From EMO Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:SFT simple example.png|right]]
 
[[File:SFT simple example.png|right]]
The principle behind SFT is simple:  if one circuit in the grid has an unplanned outage, then every other line in the grid could then become overloaded.  Therefore we need to limit the flow on some circuits just in case there is an outage.  For example, the figure shows a portion of a grid where three identical circuits are in parallel, so the total power flow is divided equally across the three. If one circuit trips, then the other two will each end up carrying 50% more power than they did prior to the trip.  To keep the post-trip loading below the capacity of the remaining circuits, the SO would need to limit the total flow to twice the capacity of each individual circuit.  Under and SFT approach, each circuit would have a constraint looking like this:
+
The principle behind SFT is simple:  if one circuit in the grid has an unplanned outage, then every other line in the grid could then become overloaded.  Therefore we need to limit the flow on some circuits just in case there is an outage.  For example, the figure shows a portion of a grid where three identical circuits are in parallel between nodes A and B, so the total power flow is divided equally across the three. If one circuit trips, then the other two will each end up carrying 50% more power than they did prior to the trip.  Under an SFT approach, each circuit would have two constraints each looking like
  
''Flow in protected circuit + 1.5 × flow in contingent circuit ≤ Capacity''
+
''Flow in protected circuit + 2 × flow in contingent circuit ≤ Capacity''
 +
 
 +
where there is one constraint for each of the other two circuits.
 +
 
 +
In principle, the SFT process:
 +
*outages each and every circuit in turn;
 +
*for each circuit outaged, check the loading on every other circuit;
 +
*formulate constraints to protect any circuits that are overload.
 +
 
 +
In practice, circuits on the grid typically have more capacity than is apparent, because their respective capacity ratings are based on steady-state operation, whereas after a circuit trips the SO has the standard off-load time of 15 minutes to re-dispatch the market to normal conditions.  In steady state, the thermal capacity rating of a circuit is determined by how much it sags due to it being heated as power flows through it:  there are statutory limits on the distance between transmission circuits and the ground, or objects on the ground (trees, etc).  Lines lengthen as they heat due to power flowing in them (and due to changes in ambient conditions) which is why they sag.
 +
 
 +
If a circuit is already loaded at its capacity rating, then it is assumed to be at maximum allowable sag and therefore the simple approach above applies.  But, if a line is running below its capacity rating, then if it suddenly carries more power due to the tripping of another line, then it will take some minutes before the additional heat produces additional sag:  for this reason, the SFT constraints can typically allow a circuit to be loaded higher after another circuit trips than might be expected.

Revision as of 14:34, 12 February 2014

SFT simple example.png

The principle behind SFT is simple: if one circuit in the grid has an unplanned outage, then every other line in the grid could then become overloaded. Therefore we need to limit the flow on some circuits just in case there is an outage. For example, the figure shows a portion of a grid where three identical circuits are in parallel between nodes A and B, so the total power flow is divided equally across the three. If one circuit trips, then the other two will each end up carrying 50% more power than they did prior to the trip. Under an SFT approach, each circuit would have two constraints each looking like

Flow in protected circuit + 2 × flow in contingent circuit ≤ Capacity

where there is one constraint for each of the other two circuits.

In principle, the SFT process:

  • outages each and every circuit in turn;
  • for each circuit outaged, check the loading on every other circuit;
  • formulate constraints to protect any circuits that are overload.

In practice, circuits on the grid typically have more capacity than is apparent, because their respective capacity ratings are based on steady-state operation, whereas after a circuit trips the SO has the standard off-load time of 15 minutes to re-dispatch the market to normal conditions. In steady state, the thermal capacity rating of a circuit is determined by how much it sags due to it being heated as power flows through it: there are statutory limits on the distance between transmission circuits and the ground, or objects on the ground (trees, etc). Lines lengthen as they heat due to power flowing in them (and due to changes in ambient conditions) which is why they sag.

If a circuit is already loaded at its capacity rating, then it is assumed to be at maximum allowable sag and therefore the simple approach above applies. But, if a line is running below its capacity rating, then if it suddenly carries more power due to the tripping of another line, then it will take some minutes before the additional heat produces additional sag: for this reason, the SFT constraints can typically allow a circuit to be loaded higher after another circuit trips than might be expected.